data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d58/b6d5861ad9e33e42b4645d00d0aefc64e5f57b59" alt="Editorial, "Don't Penalize Success", Valley News Dispatch, Feb. 18, 2006, p. A8 Editorial, "Don't Penalize Success", Valley News Dispatch, Feb. 18, 2006, p. A8"
I am well aware that the public schools need to care about how to get the funding that they need, and I resonate with the concern for how to make sure the young people in our community get a quality education.
But somehow the description of this Catch-22 sounds like the claim that people on welfare have a disincentive to getting jobs because then they would lose a source of income they have relied upon.
As I understand it, the Title I money is distributed to the school districts where there is actual need as measured by a number of factors. Success in education should produce results that change the level of need.
The article and editorial have pointed out a dilemma educators face. It would be a shame if educators experienced the current system of funding public education as a disincentive to doing their very best to help students succeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment